Friday, 27 July 2012

Global Media - USA vs Aussie



Media dominants are able to express a power in which potentially sets and frames not only political agendas but also our cultural landscape.  As a nation we are very focused around the concepts of global media and continuously affected by mass media.  According to Stevens (2003) media companies play important economic and symbolic roles in most modern states. This has all to do with the flow of information and the way in which communication technologies are central around social cultures. 

What has proven to be the most leading media all over the world is a concept that can be described as ‘Americanisation’.  The United States have a very dominant affect towards other countries and highly influence the media there.  It is not hundred precent clear that all non- American audiences are influenced but the majority of audiences are engaged with ‘foreign’ programming.

Herman and Chomsky (1988) claim that only stories with a strong orientation to elite interests can pass through and receive ample media attention.  This has everything to do with which global media landscape in influenced by those with the greatest power.

The U.S have the most dominant outlets such as Time Warner Inc., Walt Disney Co-operation and News Incorporation as these are the driving force behind most Hollywood films.

As an example to express how the United States shows dominance within the media, can be clearly identified with how many Australian movies are shown within cinemas. The way in which Australian audiences have chosen to observe is through watching foreign films. The cinema industries are more likely to show American films over Australian films as this represents the dominance of American media.  Australian cultures prefer to watch and are more interested in watching these kinds of films.

As the audience we are continuously observing and choosing what and what not to take in.



Reference:
-      -    Steven, P 2003, The no-nonsense guide to the global media, New Internationalist, Oxford, pp. 37–59.

-       -    Herman, E & McChesney, 1989, The Political Economy of the Mass Media, http://www.chomsky.info/onchomsky/198901--.htm

3 comments:

  1. Fantastic blog Jess, really understand the differences! Keep it up :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great exploration into the differences of countries and expression of media dominants. It’s interesting to understand the amount of power media dominants have through political agendas and global media. Fantastic example of the United States, explaining the power through the media and how influenced audiences can be. Its also good to see the similarities and differences of two countries and their media dominants, really good blog. Definitely keep up the good work.

      Delete
  2. A solid blog post Jess. You introduced the topic of the post well before defining the main aspect of one-way informational flows in Americanisation. The linked Herman and Chomsky source links in well with your view of the cultural acceptance of America, or more broadly, western society. The use of the American film example shows, in an understandable way, the prominence of American film across the world and the power of the media in the United States.

    ReplyDelete